A qualitative study of partnership between woman and midwife within midwife-led care clinic

Authors

  • Rizky Vaira Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Yanti Yanti Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Estu Utomo Boyolali, Indonesia
  • Asri Hidayat Universitas ‘Aisyiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31101/jhtam.1368

Keywords:

partnership, relationship, woman and midwife, midwifery care, qualitative study

Abstract

One indirect causes of maternal mortality in Indonesia is "Three Delays", delays in: (1) deciding to seek appropriate medical help for an obstetric emergency; (2) reaching an appropriate obstetric facility; and (3) receiving adequate care when a facility is reached, which has relation with the lack of women's ability in empowering herself to actively participate and to make suitable decisions about midwifery care they need. The research aims to explore the partnership between woman and midwife in midwifery care. A descriptive qualitative study was conducted using a convenience sample of six low-risk women after they had given birth and six midwives from six geographically distinct midwife-led care clinic in Bantul Regency. Data were collected through semi‑structured in‑depth interviews. The interview was conducted two  to three times and recorded by audio record. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed by the thematic analysis according to Cresswell approach. Seven major themes were identified: (a) midwives ability to partner with women, (b) equality and reciprocity, (c) negotiation, (d) empowerment, (e) trust and time, (f) sharing power and responsibility, and (g) professional friendship. Most of the women are not capable to empower themselves such as less participating in decision making, less considerate in choosing a birthing position, and worsen by the limitations of midwives availability during the delivery process. Midwives need to reflect more the philosophy meaning inside the midwifery care and strengthen the midwifery professionals curriculum in order to persuade women as a partner who capable to empower themselves and to participate actively.

References

Achadi, E. L. (2019). Kematian Maternal dan Neonatal di Indonesia.

Agus, Y., Horiuchi, S., & Iida, M. (2018). Women’s choice of maternal healthcare in Parung, West Java, Indonesia: Midwife versus traditional birth attendant. Women and Birth, 31(6), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.01.007

Agus, Y., Horiuchi, S., & Porter, S. E. (2012). Rural Indonesia women’s traditional beliefs about antenatal care. BMC Research Notes, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-589

Anderson, J. T. and J. (2015). Supporting Women in Labour and Birth. Elsevier: Australia.

Aune, I., Amundsen, H. H., & Skaget Aas, L. C. (2014). Is a midwife’s continuous presence during childbirth a matter of course? Midwives’ experiences and thoughts about factors that may influence their continuous support of women during labour. Midwifery, 30(1), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.02.001

Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012). Shared decision making - The pinnacle of patient-centered care. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(9), 780–781. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1109283

Bennett, A. E., McCartney, D., & Kearney, J. M. (2016). Views of fathers in Ireland on the experience and challenges of having a breast-feeding partner. Midwifery, 40, 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.07.004

Bohren, M. A., Vogel, J. P., Hunter, E. C., Lutsiv, O., Makh, S. K., Souza, J. P., Aguiar, C., Saraiva Coneglian, F., Diniz, A. L. A., Tunçalp, Ö., Javadi, D., Oladapo, O. T., Khosla, R., Hindin, M. J., & Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2015). The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Medicine, 12(6), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847

Bradfield, Z., Duggan, R., Hauck, Y., & Kelly, M. (2018). Midwives being “with womanâ€: An integrative review. Women and Birth, 31(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.07.011

Brown, A. (2012). Assessment Strategies for Teaching Empathy, Intuition and Sensitivity on The Labour Ward. Evidence Based Midwifery, 10, 64–70.

Clark, K., Beatty, S., & Reibel, T. (2015). Maternity care: A narrative overview of what women expect across their care continuum. Midwifery, 31(4), 432–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.12.009

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Pustaka Pelajar.

Crowther, S., Hunter, B., McAra-Couper, J., Warren, L., Gilkison, A., Hunter, M., Fielder, A., & Kirkham, M. (2016). Sustainability and resilience in midwifery: A discussion paper. Midwifery, 40, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.06.005

Crowther, S., Smythe, E., & Spence, D. (2014). The joy at birth: An interpretive hermeneutic literature review. Midwifery, 30(4), e157–e165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.01.004

Darnell, L. K. (2015). Cultural competent patient-centered nursing care. Nursing Clinics of North America, 50(1), 99–108.

Declercq, E., Sakala, C., Corry, M., Applebaum, S., & Herrlich, A. (2014). Major Survey Findings of Listening to Mothers SM III: Pregnancy and Birth : Report of the Third National U.S. Survey of Women’s Childbearing Experiences. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 23(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.23.1.9

Diorgu, F. C., Steen, M. P., Keeling, J. J., & Mason-Whitehead, E. (2016). Mothers and midwives perceptions of birthing position and perineal trauma: An exploratory study. Women and Birth, 29(6), 518–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.05.002

Edmonds, B. M. T. (2016). Committee opinion. 127(664), 175–182.

Fahy K. (1998). Being a midwife or doing midwifery? Aust Coll Midwives Incorporated J .11(2):11–6. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1031-170X(98)80028-7

Guilliland, K., & Pairman, S. (2010). Women's business: The story of the New Zealand College of Midwives 1986-2010. Christchurch: New Zealand College of Midwives.

Hollowell, J., Li, Y., Malouf, R., & Buchanan, J. (2016). Women’s birth place preferences in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the quantitative literature. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0998-5

Hunter, A., Devane, D., Houghton, C., Grealish, A., Tully, A., & Smith, V. (2017). Woman-centred care during pregnancy and birth in Ireland: Thematic analysis of women’s and clinicians’ experiences. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1521-3

Hunter, L. (2015). Being with woman: claiming midwifery space. The Practising Midwife, 18(3), 20–22.

International Confederation of Midwives. (2017). Partnership between Women and Midwives. International Confederation of Midwive, 15–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0832-0

Irvine, B., Luo, W., & León, J. A. (2015). Congenital anomalies in Canada 2013: A perinatal health surveillance report by the public health agency of Canada’s Canadian perinatal surveillance system. Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada, 35(1), 21–22. https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.35.1.04

Jewkes, R., & Penn-Kekana, L. (2015). Mistreatment of Women in Childbirth: Time for Action on This Important Dimension of Violence against Women. PLoS Medicine, 12(6), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001849

Kennedy, H. P., Grant, J., Walton, C., Shaw-Battista, J., Sandall, J., 2010. Normalizing birth in England: A qualitative study. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health 55(3), 262-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.01.006

Khresheh, R., Barclay, L., & Shoqirat, N. (2019). Caring behaviours by midwives: Jordanian women’s perceptions during childbirth. Midwifery, 74, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.03.006

Leap, N. , Hunter, B. (2016). Supporting Women for Labour and Birth. A Thoughtful Guide. Routledge, Oxon UK .

Lee Davis, D., & Walker, K. (2011). Case-loading midwifery in New Zealand: bridging the normal/abnormal divide “with womanâ€. Midwifery, 27(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2009.09.007

McAra-Couper, J., Gilkison, A., Crowther, S., Hunter, M., Hotchin, C., & Gunn, J. (2014). Partnership and reciprocity with women sustain Lead Maternity Carer midwives in practice. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal, 49, 29–33. https://doi.org/10.12784/nzcomjnl49.2014.5.29-33

Ministry of Health of Indonesia. (2017). Regulation of the Minister Health of Republic Indonesia Number 28 Year 2017 Regarding Licensing and Organization of Midwife Practices. Ministry of Health of Indonesia.

Mirghafourvand, M., Kamalifard, M., Ranjbar, F., & Gordani, N. (2018). Relationship of breastfeeding self-efficacy with quality of life in Iranian breastfeeding mothers. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 31(20), 2721–2728. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1354368

Murphy, P. A., & King, T. L. (2013). Effective communication is essential to being with woman: midwifery strategies to strengthen health education and promotion. In Journal of midwifery & women’s health (Vol. 58, Issue 3, pp. 247–248). https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12080

Nieuwenhuijze, M., Jonge, A. De, Korstjens, I., & Lagro-Jansse, T. (2012). Factors influencing the fulfillment of women’s preferences for birthing positions during second stage of labor. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 33(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2011.642428

Noseworthy, D. A., Phibbs, S. R., & Benn, C. A. (2013). Towards a relational model of decision-making in midwifery care. Midwifery, 29(7), e42–e48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.022

Oladapo, O. T., Bohren, M. A., Fawole, B., Mugerwa, K., Ojelade, O. A., Titiloye, M. A., Alu, F. E., Mambya, M. O., Oyeneyin, L., Bataale, S., Akintan, A., Alabi, O., Adebayo, A., Okike, O., Idris, H. A., Wilfred, S., Bello, H., Kyaddondo, D., Olutayo, A. O., … Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2017). Negotiating quality standards for effective delivery of labor and childbirth care in Nigeria and Uganda. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 139(December), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12398

Pairman, N. L. and S. (2015). Working in Partnership. Elsevier: Australia.

Probandari, A., Arcita, A., Kothijah, K., & Pamungkasari, E. P. (2017). Barriers to utilization of postnatal care at village level in Klaten district, central Java Province, Indonesia. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2490-y

Reed, R., Rowe, J., & Barnes, M. (2016). Midwifery practice during birth: Ritual companionship. Women and Birth, 29(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.12.003

Rotich, E., & Wolvaardt, L. (2017). A descriptive study of the health information needs of Kenyan women in the first 6 weeks postpartum. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1576-1

Rosyidah, H., Koning, d., & Ormel, H. (2019). Quality of maternal health care in Indonesia. Journal of Health Technology Assessment in Midwifery, 2(1), 10-22.

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? Research in Nursing and HealthinNursing&Health, 23(8), 334–340. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)82940-X

Spagnoletti, B. R. M., Bennett, L. R., Kermode, M., & Wilopo, S. A. (2018). “I wanted to enjoy our marriage first... but I got pregnant right awayâ€: A qualitative study of family planning understandings and decisions of women in urban Yogyakarta, Indonesia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1991-y

Sudhinaraset, M. (2017). Advancing a conceptual model to improve maternal health quality: The person-centered care framework for reproductive health equity. Gates Open Research, 1–14.

Suryaningsih, E. K. (2018). Indonesian mother’s feeling and thought during pregnancy: a qualitative study. Journal of Health Technology Assessment in Midwifery, 1(2), 57-63.

Tharpe, N. (2009). Keeping the midwifery legacy alive. Midwifery Today with International Midwife, 89, 26,66.

Thelin, I. L., Lundgren, I., & Hermansson, E. (2014). Midwives’ lived experience of caring during childbirth--a phenomenological study. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare : Official Journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives, 5(3), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2014.06.008

Withers, M., Kharazmi, N., & Lim, E. (2018). Traditional beliefs and practices in pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum: A review of the evidence from Asian countries. Midwifery, 56(March 2017), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.10.019

Wright, D., Pincombe, J. and McKellar, L. (2018). Exploring routine hospital antenatal care consultations — An ethnographic study. Women and Birth. Australian College of Midwives, 31(3), e162–e169. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.09.010

Yonemoto, N., Dowswell, T., Nagai, S., & Mori, R. (2017). Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period ( Review ). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009326.pub3.www.cochranelibrary.com

Zeyneloğlu, S., Kısa, S., Özberk, H., & Badem, A. (2017). Predictors and measurement of satisfaction with postpartum care in a government hospital. Nursing and Health Sciences, 19(2), 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12327

Downloads

Published

2020-05-20

How to Cite

Vaira, R., Yanti, Y., & Hidayat, A. (2020). A qualitative study of partnership between woman and midwife within midwife-led care clinic. Journal of Health Technology Assessment in Midwifery, 3(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.31101/jhtam.1368

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): May

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with Journal of Health Technology Assessment in Midwifery agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Journal of Health Technology Assessment in Midwifery is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License..

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.