Evidence-based implementation of normal childbirth: what are the obstacles? (qualitative study)

Authors

  • Rizki Amalia Universitas Muhammadiyah Banjarmasin, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1897-2513
  • Moch. Hakimi Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
  • Herlin Fitriani Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31101/jhtam.1180

Keywords:

Evidence-Based, Delivery Position, Partograph

Abstract

Evidence-based is a very effective strategy to improve the quality of midwifery services. One of the most frequently problems faced is the gap between midwifery practices that are in accordance with the procedures (based on evidence-based) with clinical care practices that occur in the clinic. The purpose of this study was to explore in-depth the obstacles to the implementation of evidence-based normal childbirth, which are the position of delivery, monitoring and documenting delivery by using partographs in the Independent Practice of Midwives of Gunungkidul District, Yogyakarta.This research was a qualitative research with a phenomenological descriptive approach. The participants of this study were midwives who had the Independent Midwife Practice (PMB) consisting of 7 informants. Participant selection in this study used a purposive sampling technique with convenience sampling and identification of obstacles used was the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Data collection used was semi-structured interviews and observations. Data analysis used was a thematic analysis.The interview and observation of delivery assistance is done at the Independent Midwife Practice Center (PMB). The position of delivery that was often used by patients was lithotomy and left slant, and the application of evidence-based monitoring and documentation using partograph was still not optimal. This was because there were several obstacles in its application, which were obstacles from patients, families, midwives, and obstacles from the organization. The impact of these obstacles was that it can reduce the quality of obstetric care in patients according to evidence-based. The evaluation of clinical practice based on evidence-based by the organization and the existence of feedback from patients to midwives are expected to improve the quality of service to patients.    

Author Biography

Rizki Amalia, Universitas Muhammadiyah Banjarmasin

Midwifery Program

References

Bedwell, C., Levin, K., Pett, C., & Lavender, D. T. (2017). A realist review of the partograph: When and how does it work for labour monitoring? BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1213-4

Castellan, C. M. (2010). Quantitative and Qualitative Research: A View for Clarity. International Journal of Education, 2(2), 5. Retrieved from http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ije/article/

CFIR. (2017). CFIR Constructs. Ann Arbor: Center for Clinical Management Research.

Craig, B. J., & Kabylbekova, Z. (2015). Culture and Maternity Care in Kazakhstan: What New Mothers Expected. Health Care for Women International, 36(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2014.942904

Craig, B. J., & Kapysheva, A. (2018). Situated influences on perceived barriers to health behavior change: cultural identity and context in Kazakhstan. Ethnicity and Health, 23(8), 831–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2017.1296560

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Darboe, A., Lin, I. F., & Kuo, H. W. (2016). Effort-reward imbalance and self-rated health among Gambian healthcare professionals. BMC Health Services Research, 16(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1347-0

Elvander, C., Ahlberg, M., Thies-Lagergren, L., Cnattingius, S., & Stephansson, O. (2015). Birth position and obstetric anal sphincter injury: A population-based study of 113 000 spontaneous births. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0689-7

Fisseha, G., Berhane, Y., Worku, A., & Terefe, W. (2017). Quality of the delivery services in health facilities in Northern Ethiopia. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2125-3

Grol, R., & Wensing, M. (2004). What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Medical Journal of Australia, 180(6 SUPPL.), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05948.x

Hailu, T., Nigus, K., Gidey, G., Hailu, B., & Moges, Y. (2018). Assessment of partograph utilization and associated factors among obstetric care givers at public health institutions in central zone, Tigray, Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes, 11(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3814-7

Halas, G.,Schultz, A.S.H., Rothney, J., Goertzen, L., Wener, P., Katz, A. (2015). A Scoping Review Protocol To Map The Research Foci Trends In Tobacco Control Over The Last Decade. BMJ Open, 5, e006643–e006643.

Iravani, M., Janghorbani, M., Zarean, E., & Bahrami, M. (2016). Barriers to implementing evidence-based intrapartum care: A descriptive exploratory qualitative study. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 18(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.21471

Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., Young, J. M., Odgaard-Jensen, J., French, S. D., … Oxman, A. D. (2012). Audit and feedback: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3

Jiang, H., Qian, X., Carroli, G., & Garner, P. (2017). Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth ( Review ) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR THE MAIN COMPARISON. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), 77. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3.www.cochranelibrary.com

Mandiwa, C., & Zamawe, C. (2017). Documentation of the partograph in assessing the progress of labour by health care providers in Malawi’s South-West zone. Reproductive Health, 14(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0401-7

Pazandeh, F., Huss, R., Hirst, J., House, A., & Baghban, A. A. (2015). An evaluation of the quality of care for women with low risk pregnanacy: The use of evidence-based practice during labour and childbirth in four public hospitals in Tehran. Midwifery, 31(11), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.07.003

Shaban, I. A., Hatamleh, R., Khresheh, R., & Homer, C. (2011). Childbirth practices in jordanian public hospitals: Consistency with evidence-based maternity care? International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 9(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1609.2010.00197.x

Sosa, G. A., Crozier, K. E., & Stockl, A. (2018). Midwifery one-to-one support in labour: More than a ratio. Midwifery, 62(April), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.04.016

Subani, P., & Wulandari, E. (2020). eISSN : 2598-3857 pISSN : 2528-3685 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE WITH THE USE OF PARTOGRAPH IN LABOR IN THE WORK AREA PUSKESMAS PETANANG KOTA LUBUKLINGGAU IN 2018. 4, 1–7.

Wallace, J., Nwosu, B., & Clarke, M. (2012). Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of decision makers’ perceptions. BMJ Open, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001220

Zileni, B. D., Glover, P., Jones, M., Teoh, K. K., Zileni, C. W. Z., & Muller, A. (2017). Malawi women’s knowledge and use of labour and birthing positions: A cross-sectional descriptive survey. Women and Birth, 30(1), e1–e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.06.003

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2020-11-21

How to Cite

Amalia, R., Hakimi, M., & Fitriani, H. (2020). Evidence-based implementation of normal childbirth: what are the obstacles? (qualitative study). Journal of Health Technology Assessment in Midwifery, 3(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.31101/jhtam.1180

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): November

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with Journal of Health Technology Assessment in Midwifery agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Journal of Health Technology Assessment in Midwifery is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License..

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.