LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH SOCIO ECONOMIC PREFERENCES FOR NEIGHBOURHOOD QUALITY

Authors

  • Norainah Abdul Rahman Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1544-0802
  • Nor Eeda Ali Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Malaysia. +6053742000, Malaysia
  • Norhazlan Haron Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Malaysia., Malaysia
  • Kamariah Abdullah Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Malaysia., Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31101/juara.v3i2.1450

Keywords:

Level of Satisfaction, Socio Economic, Neighbourhood Facilities and Services, Neighbourhood Quality

Abstract

Level of satisfaction (LOS) is widely used by many studies in evaluating the current situation or provision of any services. For this study the level of satisafaction is focusing on socio economic preferences in evaluating the neighbourhood facilities and services for neighbourhood quality. This paper is continuation from pervious paper on neighbourhood quality. There are two variables used for socio economic background used are which are monthly income and home ownership. The key target of the study is assess the level of satisfaction of neighbourhood facilities and services with different socio economic background. Self-administered questionnaire survey distributed at three neighbourhood area in Manjung District Perak Malaysia with the sample of 421 respondents. The analysis used to assess the level of satisfaction with different socio economic background with neighbourhood facilities and services are descriptive analysis and one-way ANOVA test. Basically the result shows that all neighbourhood facilities and services are moderate to less level of satisfaction by different socio economic background. Even though at moderate level below 4.00 scale, the result shows that the lower income gives better level of satisfaction (3.63) compared to the higher income a bit lower level of satisfaction (3.45). Nevertheless peoples who have different home ownership gives almost similar result with average moderate below 4.00 scale. People who stay at their own house scale at 3.53, who stay at rental house scale at 3.57 and other house scale ate 3.57. Based on the result the local authority the Manjung Municipal Council and related agencies must be take into account to upgrade and improve the neighbourhood facilities and services in their neighbourhood area. The feedbacks from the peoples are the best method to get the actual situation and exact facts.

Author Biography

Norainah Abdul Rahman, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch

Department of Town and Regional Planng,Faculty of Architecture Planning and Surveying

References

Aiello, A., Ardone, R. G., & Scopelliti, M. (2010). Neighbourhood Planning Improvement: Physical Attributes, Cognitive and Affective Evaluation and Activities in Two Neighbourhoods in Rome. Evaluation and Program Planning, (33), 264-275.

Bonaiuto, M., Fornara, F., & Bonnes, M. (2003). Indexes of Perceived Residential Environment Quality and Neighbourhood Attachment in Urban Environments: A Confirmation Study on the City Of Rome. Landscape and Urban Planning(65), 41-52.

Chau, C. K., Yung, H. K., Leung, T. M., & Law, M. Y. (2006). Evaluation of Relative Importance of Environmental Issues Associated With a Residential Estate in Hong Kong. Landscape and Urban Planning, (77), 67-79.

Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan Kaedah Penyelidikan (Vol. 1). Malaysia: Mc-Graw Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.

Connerly, C. E., & Marans, R. W. (1985). Comparing Two Global Measures of Perceived Neighborhood Quality. Social Indicators Research, 17, 29-47.

Djebarni, R., & Al-Abed, A. (2000). Satisfaction Level with Neighbourhoods in Low-Income Public Housing in Yemen. Property Management, 18(4), 230-242.

Erkip, F. (2010). Community and Neighborhood Relations in Ankara: An Urban–Suburban Contrast. Cities, (27), 96-102.

Fornara, F., Bonaiuto, M., & Bonnes, M. (2010). Cross-Validation of Abbreviated Perceived Residential Environment Quality (PREQ) and Neighborhood Attachment (NA) Indicators. Environment and Behavior, 42(2), 171-196.

Galster, G. C., & Hesser, G. W. (1981). Residential Satisfaction: Compositional and Contextual Correlates. Environment and Behavior, 13(6), 735-758.

Gbakeji, J. O., & Magnus, O. O. (2007). Aspects of Residential and Neighbourhood Preferences in the Warri Metropolis, Delta State, Nigeria. Studies Home Communication Science, 1(12), 121-126.

Ge, J., & Hokao, K. (2004). Residential Environment Index System and Evaluation Model Established by Subjective and Objective Methods. Journal Of Zhejiang University Science, 5(9), 1028-1034.

Ge, J., & Hokao, K. (2006). Research on Residential Lifestyles in Japanese Cities from the Viewpoints of Residential Preference, Residential Choice and Residential Satisfaction. Landscape and Urban Planning, (78), 165-178.

Lee, T., & Marans, R. W. (1980). Objective and Subjective Indicators: Effects of Scale Discordance on Interrelationships. Social Indicators Research, 8, 47-64.

Manjung Municipal Council. (1997a). Draf Rancangan Tempatan Lumut - Seri Manjung 1997-2010 [Draft Local Plan of Lumut - Seri Manjung 1997 - 2010]. Ipoh: Department of Town and Country Planning Perak State.

Manjung Municipal Council. (1997b). Draf Rancangan Tempatan Lumut - Seri Manjung 1997-2010 [Draft Local Plan of Lumut - Seri Manjung 1997 - 2010]. Ipoh: Department of Town and Country Planning Perak State.

Manjung Municipal Council. (2011). Rancangan Tempatan Daerah Manjung (Pengubahan) 2020 [Manjung Distrcit Local Plan (Alteration) 2020]. Ipoh: Departmant of Town and Country Planning Perak State.

Niezabitowski, A. (1987). Study of Residential Environment and Psychological Needs. Design Studies, 8(2), 109-116.

Ogu, V. I. (2002). Urban Residential Satisfaction and the Planning Implications in a Developing World Context: The Example of Benin City, Nigeria. International Planning Studies, 7(1), 37-53.

Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2002). How Neighborhood Features Affect Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research, 59, 79-114.

Sulaiman, H., & Yahaya, N. (1987). Housing Provision and Satisfaction of Low-Income Households in Kuala Lumpur. Habitat International, 11(4), 27-38.

Tan, T. H. (2012). Housing Satisfaction in Medium- and High-Cost Housing: The case of Greater Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International, 36, 108-116.

Westaway, M. S. (2006). A Longitudinal Investigation of Satisfaction with Personal and Environmental Quality Of Life in an Informal South African Housing Settlement, Doornkop, Soweto. Habitat International, (30), 175-189.

Yang, M. J., Yang, M. S., Shih, C. H., & See, I. K. (2002). Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Perceived Neighbourhood Quality in Taiwan. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56(7), 492-496.

Yi, C. C. (1985). Urban Housing Satisfaction in a Transitional Society: A Case Study in Taichung, Taiwan. Urban Studies, 22, 1-12.

Zhao, K. (2009). The Relationships between Perceived Residential Environment Quality and Perceived Restoration in Urban Residents. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Information Science and Engineering (ICISE2009).

Downloads

Published

2020-09-14

How to Cite

Rahman, N. A., Ali, N. E., Haron, N., & Abdullah, K. (2020). LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH SOCIO ECONOMIC PREFERENCES FOR NEIGHBOURHOOD QUALITY. Jurnal Arsitektur Dan Perencanaan (JUARA), 3(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.31101/juara.v3i2.1450

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): September (Jurnal Arsitektur dan Perencanaan)

Section

Planning

Citation Check

License

With the receipt of the article by the JUARA and the decision to be published, then the copyright regarding the article will be diverted to Journal of JUARA. Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta as the publisher of Journal of JUARA hold the copyright regarding all the published articles in this journal.

Journal of Health Studies is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.