STUDI PERBANDINGAN KINERJA PENCAHAYAAN DARI RAK CAHAYA KONVENSIONAL DAN RAK PENGARAH CAHAYA PADA GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TINGGI

Authors

  • Christy Vidiyanti Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Abraham Seno Bachrun Universitas Mercu Buana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31101/juara.v5i1.2159

Keywords:

light guiding shelf, light shelf, daylighting, shading device, Dialux

Abstract

Daylight conditions in high-rise buildings have phenomenon that the side of the room that is close to the window have a high level of daylight, while the other side receives less daylight. The use of light shelf is still possible to be installed, but light shelf still have a minimum Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI) value of 44%. This happens because the process of reflection on the light shelf occurs more than once. This study tries to design a light guiding shelf with the principle of reducing the amount of reflection so that the light received by the space is not reduced too much. This research will use the Sahid Sudirman Center as a case study building. The method used in this research is the experimental method. The hypothesis in this study is that buildings with light guiding shelf produce better and more uniform lighting quality than buildings with conventional light shelf. The data will be taken using the Dialux software to get data on the intensity of daylight on the building. The results showed that the conventional light shelf only had the best performance on uniformity of daylight at 12.00. While the light guiding shelf has the best performance on all criteria, that sDA350-6650, light uniformity, light contrast and DGP at 08.00 and 16.00. In addition to being able to meet the best daylighting quantity performance, the light guiding shelf is also able to produce good daylighting quality performance. So overall, light guiding shelf has better lighting performance than conventional light shelf, so the hypothesis in this study is accepted. 

Author Biographies

Christy Vidiyanti, Universitas Mercu Buana

Program Studi Arsitektur

Abraham Seno Bachrun, Universitas Mercu Buana

Program Studi Arsitektur

References

Biantoro, A. W., & Permana, D. S. 2017. Analisis audit energi untuk pencapaian efisiensi energi di gedung ab, kabupaten tangerang, banten. Jurnal Teknik Mesin Mercu Buana, 6(2), 85-93.

BSN. 2010. Revisi SNI 03-6197: Konservasi Energi pada Sistem Pencahayaan

BSN. 2001. SNI 03-2396-2001: Tata Cara Perancangan Pencahayaan Alami Siang Hari untuk Rumah dan Gedung

Lee, K. S., Han, K. J., & Lee, J. W. 2017. The impact of shading type and azimuth orientation on the daylighting in a classroom–focusing on effectiveness of façade shading, comparing the results of DA and UDI. Energies, 10(5), 635.

Lee, H., Seo, J., & Chang-ho, C. 2019. Preliminary study on the performance evaluation of a light shelf based on reflector curvature. Energies, 12(22) doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en12224295

Lee, Heangwoo. 2020. A basic study on the performance evaluation of a movable light shelf with a rolling reflector that can change reflectivity to improve the visual environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8338. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228338

Moazzeni, M. H., & Ghiabaklou, Z. 2016. Investigating the influence of light shelf geometry parameters on daylight performance and visual comfort, a case study of educational space in tehran, iran. Buildings, 6(3), 26. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings6030026

Moreno, M. B. P., & Labarca, C. Y. 2015. Methodology for assessing daylighting design strategies in classroom with a climate-based method. Sustainability, 7(1), 880-897. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su7010880

Vidiyanti, Christy. 2015. Efektivitas Light Guided Panel untuk Optimasi Tingkat Pencahayaan Alami pada Gedung Bertingkat. Tesis. Bandung: Program studi Arsitektur, Institut Teknologi Bandung.

Published

2022-02-11

How to Cite

Vidiyanti, C., & Bachrun, A. S. (2022). STUDI PERBANDINGAN KINERJA PENCAHAYAAN DARI RAK CAHAYA KONVENSIONAL DAN RAK PENGARAH CAHAYA PADA GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TINGGI. Jurnal Arsitektur Dan Perencanaan (JUARA), 5(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.31101/juara.v5i1.2159

Citation Check