Cost-effectiveness of screenings for mental health in pregnancy: A systematic review

Indah Dwi Kartikasari; Widya Rahayu; Novita Andriani; Sekar Ajeng Pramesti; Juliana Safitri; Ajeng Viska Icanervila; Andari Wuri Astuti

doi:10.31101/jhes.3665

Authors

Indah Dwi Kartikasari Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta
Widya Rahayu Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta
Novita Andriani Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta
Sekar Ajeng Pramesti Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta
Juliana Safitri Universitas 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta
Ajeng Viska Icanervila Gadjah Mada University
Andari Wuri Astuti Universitas Aisyiyah Yogyakarta https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3643-4022

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31101/jhes.3665
Abstract views 722 times

Keywords:

CEA, Post Effectiveness Analysis, Mental Health screening

Abstract

Mental disorders posses significant obstacles both during and after pregnancy for many women. Birth weight, premature birth, perinatal and infant deaths, postpartum psychopathology, emotional difficulties, inappropriate behavior in children and adolescents, and adverse effects on other people are just a few of the negative impacts that mental disorders are linked to during pregnancy in that family. Women with mental disorders may experience issues after giving birth, affecting their health throughout pregnancy. Infections, including depression, frequently go undiagnosed and receive subpar treatment despite routine interactions with medical providers during pregnancy. Hormonal changes impact Mother's body movements; for example, she moves more slowly and gets exhausted more rapidly. Pregnant ladies who are in this scenario tend to become indolent. A systematic assessment of research findings on the effectiveness of economic evaluation of mental health screening instruments during pregnancy is frequently used to encourage early detection of mental health in pregnant women as maternal reactions become more sensitive, irritable, and irritable. These investigations mostly used the EPDS and PHQ-9. For the systematic review portion of this investigation, the PRISM ScR 2020 Flowchart was employed, and the A search of the literature was done using the databases Pubmed and Whiley. This article was assessed using the CHEC-Extended checklist. Two reports satisfied the inclusion criteria after an investigation of 890 chosen papers. The systematic review identified three themes: cost, effectiveness, and threshold. Given the variety of treatments used to treat mental health issues in pregnant women, it is clear that using two approaches rather than just one will result in greater cost-effectiveness

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Andari Wuri Astuti, Universitas Aisyiyah Yogyakarta

Google Scholar URL

Scopus ID 57211968612

References

Chen, H. X., Selix, N., & Nosek, M. (2020). Perinatal Anxiety and Depression during the COVID 19 Pandemic.

Earls, M. F., Yogman, M. W., Mattson, G., Rafferty, J., Baum, R., Gambon, T., Lavin, A., Wissow, L., & Health, C. on P. A. of C. and F. (2019). Incorporating recognition and management of perinatal depression into pediatric practice. Pediatrics, 143(1).

FARHAN KAMALI ADLI. (2022). Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale (EPDS): Deteksi Dini dan Skrining Depresi Post-partum. In Jurnal Kesehatan (Vol. 13, Issue 2). Online.

Gisseman MC USA, J., Fletcher, T., Schmolze MC USA, A., Cooper, D., Aden, J., & Cox-Bauer DO, C. (2021). Depression screening during pregnancy: Compliance and effectiveness in a military population. Military Medicine, 186(9–10), e951–e955.

Heslin, M., Jin, H., Trevillion, K., Ling, X., Nath, S., Barrett, B., Demilew, J., Ryan, E. G., O’Connor, S., & Sands, P. (2022). Cost-effectiveness of screening tools for identifying depression in early pregnancy: a decision tree model. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 774.

Heslin, M., Jin, H., Trevillion, K., Ling, X., Nath, S., Barrett, B., Demilew, J., Ryan, E. G., O’Connor, S., Sands, P., Milgrom, J., Bick, D., Stanley, N., Hunter, M. S., Howard, L. M., & Byford, S. (2022a). Cost-effectiveness of screening tools for identifying depression in early pregnancy: a decision tree model. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 774. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08115-x

Heslin, M., Jin, H., Trevillion, K., Ling, X., Nath, S., Barrett, B., Demilew, J., Ryan, E. G., O’Connor, S., Sands, P., Milgrom, J., Bick, D., Stanley, N., Hunter, M. S., Howard, L. M., & Byford, S. (2022b). Cost-effectiveness of screening tools for identifying depression in early pregnancy: a decision tree model. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08115-x

Littlewood, E., Ali, S., Dyson, L., Keding, A., & Ansell, P. (2018). Mengidentifikasi depresi perinatal dengan instrumen penemuan kasus : studi metode campuran ( BaBY PaNDA – Lahir dan Dibesarkan di Yorkshire PeriNatal Depression Akurasi Diagnostik ). 6. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr06060

Littlewood, E., Ali, S., Dyson, L., Keding, A., Ansell, P., Bailey, D., Bates, D., Baxter, C., Beresford-Dent, J., Clarke, A., Gascoyne, S., Gray, C., Hackney, L., Hewitt, C., Hutchinson, D., Jefferson, L., Mann, R., Marshall, D., McMillan, D., … Gilbody, S. (2018a). Identifying perinatal depression with case-finding instruments: a mixed-methods study (BaBY PaNDA – Born and Bred in Yorkshire PeriNatal Depression Diagnostic Accuracy). Health Services and Delivery Research, 6(6), 1–210. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr06060

Littlewood, E., Ali, S., Dyson, L., Keding, A., Ansell, P., Bailey, D., Bates, D., Baxter, C., Beresford-Dent, J., Clarke, A., Gascoyne, S., Gray, C., Hackney, L., Hewitt, C., Hutchinson, D., Jefferson, L., Mann, R., Marshall, D., McMillan, D., … Gilbody, S. (2018b). No Title. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr06060

Littlewood, E., Ali, S., Dyson, L., Keding, A., Ansell, P., Bailey, D., Bates, D., Beresford-Dent, J., Clarke, A., & Gascoyne, S. (2018). Identifying perinatal depression with case-finding instruments: a mixed-methods study (BaBY PaNDA–Born and Bred in Yorkshire PeriNatal Depression Diagnostic Accuracy). Health Services and Delivery Research, 1–244.

Odnoletkova, I. (2017). CHEC-Extended : A tool for the quality assessment of economic evaluations of healthcare interventions A tool for the quality assessment of economic evaluations of healthcare interventions CHEC-Extended. February.

Trevillion, K., Ryan, E. G., Pickles, A., Heslin, M., Byford, S., Nath, S., Bick, D., Milgrom, J., Mycroft, R., Domoney, J., Pariante, C., & Howard, L. M. (2014). Jurnal Gangguan Afektif Uji coba terkontrol acak kelompok paralel eksploratif tentang Bantuan Mandiri Terpandu antenatal ( ditambah perawatan biasa ) versus perawatan biasa saja untuk wanita hamil dengan depresi : Uji coba DAWN.